Rhode Island Franchise Bill attracts attention from both the IFA and CFA
Posted by Jim Coen on April 30th, 2008
In response to the Rhode Island Fair Dealership Act of 2007 (Act), Rhode Island State Senator Daniel Connors (D) and House Majority Leader Gordon Fox (D) have filed SB 2592 and HB 8150, respectively, to undo many of the provisions of the current law.
The International Franchise Association (IFA) sent letters to the bills’ sponsors State Senator Daniel Connors and State Representative and House Majority Leader Gerald Fox, as well as to key legislative leaders voicing strong support for the proposals to rescind the Act. The IFA claims on their website to be the only association serving as the voice for franchising in the United States. IFA’s membership encompasses some 1,300 franchisors, 500 suppliers, and over 10,000 franchisee members.
On the other side of the issue is the Coalition of Franchisee Associations (CFA) which opposes Rhode Island Senate Bill 2592. The CFA is a coalition of brand specific franchisee associations focused on strengthening the franchisee community; representing over 15,000 franchisees and employing over 1.5 million individuals.
CFA members include the Brown Board Owners Association (UPS Stores), DD Independent Franchise Owners, Inc. (Dunkin’ Donuts), Independent Hardee’s Franchisee Association, Meineke Dealers’ Association, National Association of Buffalo Wings Franchisees Inc., National Coalition of Associations of 7-Eleven Franchisees, National Franchisee Association, Inc. (Burger King), and North American Association of Subway Franchisees.
CFA opposes SB 2592 in that it weakens franchisee’s positions relating to contract terminations by diminishing the intent of The Rhode Island Fair Dealership Act.
- Specifically, the law incorporates the following provisions: “Notice Period” provision - requires the franchisor to give the franchisee at least 90 days written notice prior to termination of their contract.
- “Cure Period” provision - provides the franchisee 60 days to remedy any claimed deficiencies from the termination notice.
- “Good Cause” provision – specifically defines “good cause” for franchisor’s termination of franchise agreement as: Failure to comply with reasonable requirements of the franchise agreement. Bad faith in carrying out the terms of the agreement.
SB 2592 would lessen the notice period and eliminate both the cure period and good cause requirement.
The IFA believes that the Act makes it extremely difficult for a franchisor to end a relationship with a particular franchisee even when there are serious violations, such as safety and health code problems, violations of state or local laws, or failure to secure and maintain insurance.
CFA believes that small business owners should be given ample notice of a contract termination and the opportunity to remedy any problems before losing their businesses.

Saladworks
Ice cream marketer
The Canton-based franchise has hired
Robert Preer reports on
Currito
The
Uno Restaurant Holdings Corp.
Dunkin’ Donuts




Recent Comments